A federal judge has ruled that Google engaged in illegal practices to preserve its monopoly in the online search market. This landmark decision, delivered by Judge Amit Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, found that Google’s business practices were anticompetitive and violated antitrust laws.

The ruling addresses Google’s dominance in the search engine market, where it controls more than 90% of the market share. The court found that Google used its position to stifle competition, including agreements with smartphone manufacturers and other tech companies to ensure that Google Search is the default option.This decision could have significant implications for Google and other tech giants, potentially leading to major changes in their business practices. It might prompt new regulations or government actions aimed at curbing monopolistic behavior and increasing competition in the tech industry.The case is part of broader scrutiny of big tech companies and their market influence. The ruling may also inspire further legal challenges and regulatory measures against other tech giants, reshaping the landscape of the technology sector